One thing to consider is the 'nobarrier' option for ext4 - apparently makes a big performance difference.
Thanks, On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Marco Shaw <marco.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd love to try it and break it down using SystemTap... I just don't > have the free time. > > "RHEL 5.5 + updates" versus "RHEL 6 Beta 2 July refresh"? > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:12 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens > <mstev...@imt-systems.com> wrote: > > 2010/11/9 Marco Shaw <marco.s...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Well, right off, when you listed your hardware, I never assumed it was > >> virtualized. At the very least, I would want to see this test in a > >> hypervisor virtualized environment, and even better directly on > >> hardware. > >> > >> Adding an virtual application layer adds so much to the equation that > >> your RHEL5 being faster than RHEL6 is no longer valid, in my mind. > > > > A few days ago I had the same tests on real hardware and VMWare ESXi 4.1 > with exactly the same results. > > > > If you want you can like to try it yourself. > > _______________________________________________ > rhelv6-beta-list mailing list > rhelv6-beta-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-beta-list >
_______________________________________________ rhelv6-beta-list mailing list rhelv6-beta-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-beta-list
