|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ANNOUNCEMENTS and ARTICLES: http://pnews.org/art/art.shtml ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corrigenda to this article: Muslims are using terror tactics because they perceive that the entire Western World is against them and their religion. Religion is after all one of the most powerful social binding forces available to humanity. (And if you doubt me, just consider what sort of binding force would allow an entire nation to resist the might of the Seleucid Empire. And the Roman Empire. And ... ) I would of course like to ask her if she has fallen into the trap of the "good, righteous Jew" stereotype in declaring "There is NEVER a reasonable excuse for the use of terror. When you explain and find plausible reasons for terror, you help to perpetrate its use." Since I happen to know rather well she does not consider the unprovoked mass murder of 150 in Deir Yassin on the 9th April 1948 - anniversary just a few days away now - to be either a massacre or an act of terrorism. And I find her statement: "The Irish have been fighting each other and the British for centuries and neither side ever deliberately targeted innocent civilians.", frankly laughable. "Sunday, Bloody Sunday. "Sunday, Bloody Sunday. "How long, how long must we sing this song? "How long, how long?" "Ironically, if poverty were the reason for terror, then the Arabs who live in Israel would have less reason for using terror than any others because their standard of living was the highest in the Middle East prior to the Oslo debacle!" And that is a prime example of what I have to deal with - confabulation of the grosser sort. By confusing - deliberately or not - the Arabs who were citizens of Israel, with the Palestinians under occupation who aren't, she gets away with making absurd statements of this sort. Of course the Israeli Arabs have a high standard of living - it's called the "trickle-down" theory. That isn't exactly true of the people in Gaza or the West Bank under occupation. Dafna Yee will continue to fail in her self-imposed task of making sense out of the world while she herself using stereotypes and refuses to consider basic human realities. Shalom uvrakha Wesley Parish On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 09:52, you wrote: > ANNOUNCEMENTS and ARTICLES: http://pnews.org/art/art.shtml > > > From: Dafna Yee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bluewhale > > > There is NEVER an Excuse for Terrorism > > I was sent an article from from the Christian Science Monitor which > "explains" anti-Semitism. This is the header of the article with its URL: > > An Anti-Semitic Left Hook > - Patrick Chisholm > One finds pockets of anti-Semitism at anti-globalization rallies, and > plenty of it at pro-Palestinian rallies. Palestinian hatred of Israelis, I > suspect, is based on more than just land disputes and the policies of > Israel. Much of it likely derives from envy. Jews as a whole are among the > most able, hard-working, and intelligent people ever to inhabit the earth. > Wherever they go they succeed. They turned Israel into an economic > powerhouse for its size, and "made the desert bloom." Success breeds envy. > Envy breeds hatred. Terrorism is the end result. (Christian Science > Monitor http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0323/p25s01-coop.html) > > Here is my response: > > Frankly, this article is perpetrating stereotypes about Jews and "reasons" > for anti-Semitism while appearing to be against that very thing. I'm sure > the writer thought that he was being very pro-Jewish when he wrote this > but that only points out how insidious this line of argument is. (However, > let me make it clear that I am not accusing the writer of being an > anti-Semite.) The fact is that the terror tactics that are being used > against Israelis have nothing to do with either Jewish ethnic qualities > (which don't really exist anyway!) or about Israel's policies and land > disputes. This "stereotype theory" has always been a useful excuse for > propaganda but, regardless of whether you are using good or bad qualities, > it is still untrue. > > This concept is also a dangerous argument because if you can believe that > all, or even most, Jews share good qualities because of their ethnicity > then you can believe with equal fervor that they all share the > stereotypical bad ones -- greed, lying, vulgarity ... you name it. It is > not an accident that the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" pamphlet has > been used so successfully in the Arab countries in their hate campaign > along with the "Blood Libel"; they are using the bad stereotypes to > specify the targets for terror. But, that doesn't make the bad stereotypes > the cause of terror, either. > > In addition, if the writer's analysis of the cause of terror had merit, > why didn't he (or anyone else) try to find ethnic qualities or use > poverty/failure as a reason to explain the terror used to kill Spaniards > in the train explosion two weeks ago? Or apply the same reasoning to the > train explosion in Japan last December if what happened was really the > expression of envy leading to hatred leading to terror? People are using > terror tactics against the Israelis (and now others as well) because the > world has demonstrated very clearly that such tactics bring political > dividends! Period! > > Also, the writer, like so many other people, in attempting to understand > the motives of the terrorists, is condoning their use of terror, albeit > unwittingly. There is NEVER a reasonable excuse for the use of terror. > When you explain and find plausible reasons for terror, you help to > perpetrate its use. > > The use of terror by Arabs (and now copycat groups) is directly related to > the Muslim culture's goal of "conquest for Allah by any means at all" and > the fact that their mentality has never left the 14th century when the > Ottoman Empire was expanding. Modern democracy and concepts of > international law are simply words; they have no reality in the feudal > theocracies that exist in the Arab countries of the Middle East. The Arabs > use anti-Semitic stereotypes (both their own and others -- Hitler's regime > has supplied much of them) to gain supporters and to excuse their terror > tactics because that has proved successful for aggressors over the > centuries, but their hatred of Israel is not due to anything that the > Israelis have done or not done. The Arabs want to destroy Israel because > they can't rule it as a Muslim country. Very dog-in-the-mangerish ... They > didn't want the land but they don't want the Jews to have it even if only > the Jews made any good use of it. Use of terror tactics in their attempts > to destroy Israel is the first step in their plan for world domination and > Christians the world over would be wise not to dismiss it as merely the > result of Jew-envy. > > The Arabs used terror originally because it fit their philosophy and they > have escalated its use because they weren't stopped. The only ties that > terror has to anti-Semitism in any form is that the world excuses (and too > often supports) the use of terror against Jews. (Remember the FBI didn't > even classify the explosion at LAX as a terror, just as a "possible hate > or work crime" nor did they name the perpetrator a terrorist for nine > months)! The same is true for other countries' "investigations" into > barbaric acts that cause universal outrage when perpetrated against anyone > other than Jews. Much of the money that is supposed to go for "peace" > helps to finance terror because people are duped into believing the lie > that the Arabs are acting this way because they are "oppressed by the > wicked Jews". (In a similar way, many people who were against Fascist > Spain supported Communist organizations whose propaganda line also talked > about "globalization" and "human rights" to cover up their true political > aims.) > > If terror was the end result of poverty and envy, then why does this > explanation only get used in the case when Jews are being targeted? When > the Blacks were rioting in the '60s, they did not blow themselves up along > with as many White people as possible. (They also did not use their > children as human bombs.) Where were the revolts of Black slaves against > their White masters if poverty and envy caused people to adopt terror > tactics? In South Africa, the most common crime during apartheid was arson > and it was always used by the Whites against the Blacks, not the other way > around. So, where did "envy and poverty" come in? The Irish have been > fighting each other and the British for centuries and neither side ever > deliberately targeted innocent civilians. There is not a single instance > in history, other than this terror directed against Israel/Jews, where > "envy" (or "humiliation") caused this cult atmosphere of hatred to the > extent where the perpetrators taught their children that the greatest goal > is to be a "martyr" by killing themselves and as many Jews as possible. > And there is certainly no instance where so many people accept so many > excuses for barbarism. > > Poverty and oppression do not cause people to revolt (though they are the > most common excuse) and they are definitely not the reason that people > adopt terror tactics. They are the explanations used by educated, often > wealthy people who do not fight themselves, to convince people to fight > for a "cause". Ironically, if poverty were the reason for terror, then the > Arabs who live in Israel would have less reason for using terror than any > others because their standard of living was the highest in the Middle East > prior to the Oslo debacle! Claiming that terror comes from envy of the > Jews because of their innate "superiority" is just another way of using > stererotypes to blame the victim for being victimized. And that is always > wrong, no matter how nicely it is phrased. > > Dafna Yee, director > JWD - Jewish Watch Dog > http://jwd-jewishwatchdog.home.comcast.net > > --- > / o o \ PNEWS Topic Specific Portals (Vortals) > ===OO=====OO============================================ > [1] http://pnews.org/NWO/phpnuke/ (Piss Off George Portal) > [2] http://pnews.org/MEP/phpnuke/ (Myth Busters Portal) > [3] http://g0lem.net/PHP/phpnuke/ (Insane Planet Portal) > [4] http://g0lem.net/HTH/phpnuke/ (Wacko World Portal) > [5] http://g0lem.net/AAA/phpnuke/ (Bad-Ass Truth Portal) > [6] http://pnews.org/AAA/phpnuke/ (Naked Truth Portal) > [7] http://pnews.org/portal/ (PNEWS Portal) > [8] http://g0lem.net/portal/ (TheGolemsPortal) > ======================================================== > \_/ \_/ -- Wesley Parish * * * Clinersterton beademung - in all of love. RIP James Blish * * * Mau e ki, "He aha te mea nui?" You ask, "What is the most important thing?" Maku e ki, "He tangata, he tangata, he tangata." I reply, "It is people, it is people, it is people." --- / o o \ PNEWS Topic Specific Portals (Vortals) ===OO=====OO============================================ [1] http://pnews.org/NWO/phpnuke/ (Piss Off George Portal) [2] http://pnews.org/MEP/phpnuke/ (Myth Busters Portal) [3] http://g0lem.net/PHP/phpnuke/ (Insane Planet Portal) [4] http://g0lem.net/HTH/phpnuke/ (Wacko World Portal) [5] http://g0lem.net/AAA/phpnuke/ (Bad-Ass Truth Portal) [6] http://pnews.org/AAA/phpnuke/ (Naked Truth Portal) [7] http://pnews.org/portal/ (PNEWS Portal) [8] http://g0lem.net/portal/ (TheGolemsPortal) ======================================================== \_/ \_/
