On the storage interface there is a notify on change event. Any reason
you can think of to not just use that instead of the checksum?

On Sep 11, 8:37 pm, "Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah :-)Load it using Assembly.Load(File.ReadAllBytes(file))
>
> Nasty, but works.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:12 AM, webpaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ok, it was compiling to memory, was able to get it to compile to a
> > file and cache it after that. The file is getting locked though so I
> > can't clean it up in the tests without closing mbunit. Looks like this
> > is going to take longer than I thought. :)
>
> > On Sep 11, 3:22 pm, webpaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > That's what I was trying to do but that wasn't working out for me, the
> > > file wasn't there for some reason. I'll try again later, maybe I'm
> > > missing something.
>
> > > On Sep 11, 2:05 pm, "Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Sorry, the cache is persistent, it has to survive app restarts.
> > > > We already have transient cache. I am not sure that I follow why
> > serializing
> > > > the context is good. You can just start a new one with the cached
> > generated
> > > > assembly
>
> > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 9:21 PM, webpaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > From my first look at the code that seemed to be the easiest way to
> > do
> > > > > the caching. The last thing I tried was accessing the DLL location
> > > > > created by the compiler context and when retrieving the cached copy
> > to
> > > > > populate the object with the info but that didn't work either, that
> > is
> > > > > in fact how the code is as-posted right now. So I tried serializing
> > > > > the whole object and that, but neither seemed to work. I'm open to
> > > > > suggestions if you think there is an easier way to do it.
>
> > > > > On Sep 11, 9:12 am, "Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Why do you need to save the compiler context?
>
> > > > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:44 PM, webpaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Working on doing this as per:
>
> >http://www.ayende.com/Blog/archive/2008/09/10/Persistent-DSL-caching-.
> > > > > ..
>
> > > > > > > Can someone suggest how to serialize or otherwise save a
> > > > > > > CompilerContext instance without modifying the Boo project as
> > well?-
> > > > > Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Rhino Tools Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to