Jason,a) we need to test the MSMQ implementation somehow. b) I would probably be a good idea, yeah.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Jason Meckley <[email protected]>wrote: > > I attempted to compile RSB from GitHub this morning to be greeted with > a large number of failing test. I quickly realized they are failing > because MSMQ is required for testing. I grabbed the binaries from the > build directory (rather than release) and updated my application. > > a few hours later I thought: RSB can use MSMQ or RQ for message > processing, so why would the tests require MSMQ (or RQ for that > matter)? Wouldn't the tests use a mock/fake to handle the queueing? > This way RSB can successfully complete a build (psake) without MSMQ or > RQ. Another option: have a flag in the build stript to test with RQ or > MSMQ. I would think this is much more work than using a fake queue. > > Taking that a step farther, wouldn't it make sense to separate the > MSMQ provider into a separate assembly, just like RQ? If you're using > the MSMQ provider it would be installed and the tests would pass > because MSMQ is part of the infrastructure. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
