not that much, we are basically talking about moving the Msmq namespace out.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Jason Meckley <[email protected]>wrote: > > what effect will that have on separating MSMQ from RSB? > > On Sep 3, 12:38 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > > I wouldn't mind putting this as a separate project.Just take into account > > that a LOT of things happen at the transport layer, such as the > transaction > > management part. > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Jason Meckley <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > I definitely agree MSMQ needs to be tested, but should MSMQ tests be a > > > part of RSB? The only reason I raise this point is because RSB does > > > give us a choice between RQ and MSMQ. > > > > > On Sep 3, 12:02 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Jason,a) we need to test the MSMQ implementation somehow. > > > > b) I would probably be a good idea, yeah. > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Jason Meckley < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > I attempted to compile RSB from GitHub this morning to be greeted > with > > > > > a large number of failing test. I quickly realized they are failing > > > > > because MSMQ is required for testing. I grabbed the binaries from > the > > > > > build directory (rather than release) and updated my application. > > > > > > > a few hours later I thought: RSB can use MSMQ or RQ for message > > > > > processing, so why would the tests require MSMQ (or RQ for that > > > > > matter)? Wouldn't the tests use a mock/fake to handle the queueing? > > > > > This way RSB can successfully complete a build (psake) without MSMQ > or > > > > > RQ. Another option: have a flag in the build stript to test with RQ > or > > > > > MSMQ. I would think this is much more work than using a fake queue. > > > > > > > Taking that a step farther, wouldn't it make sense to separate the > > > > > MSMQ provider into a separate assembly, just like RQ? If you're > using > > > > > the MSMQ provider it would be installed and the tests would pass > > > > > because MSMQ is part of the infrastructure. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
