Take a look at the build scripts RT used to have, you'll quickly figure out what I went with this route :-)
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Paul Cowan <[email protected]> wrote: > Powershell won't work on mono will it? > > Much as I hate the xml syntax of nant. It was sort of nice that basically > all OSS projects used the same build engine and having the builder as part > of the distribution is really cool. > > I hope nobody thinks I am trying to say which builder an OSS project should > use. I just want to raise the point. > > > > Cheers > > Paul Cowan > > Cutting-Edge Solutions (Scotland) > > http://thesoftwaresimpleton.blogspot.com/ > > > > 2009/10/25 Nathan Stott <[email protected]> > > Dependency on powershell is fine as long as it's not meant to work on mono >> >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I don't do ruby >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Dependcy on rake is worse than PS IMO >>>> >>>> >>>> reasoning? >>>> >>>> I'd think that Paul's point is that IronRuby is 100% xcopy deployable, >>>> and you can put what you need in the /tools and be done with it. >>>> >>>> imo basing scripts on IRuby/Boo is great, cuz the language lends itself >>>> to DSLs (you know this already), and you still can use the BCL (so it's >>>> better than cRuby for .NET people who are familiar with System.IO etc.) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dependcy on rake is worse than PS IMO >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Paul Cowan <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >> A patch would be welcome. >>>>>> >>>>>> On a selfish not, I wish you had gone for rake or rake-me >>>>>> http://github.com/agross/rake-me rather than psake as the new >>>>>> builder. >>>>>> >>>>>> The dependency on powershell could be frustrating or not being able to >>>>>> add the builder as part of the distribution could be frustrating. >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyway, that is very much just my opinion. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> Paul Cowan >>>>>> >>>>>> Cutting-Edge Solutions (Scotland) >>>>>> >>>>>> http://thesoftwaresimpleton.blogspot.com/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2009/10/24 Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> Not at the moment, no. >>>>>>> A patch would be welcome. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:47 PM, dagda1 <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there anyway or a switch that you can pass into the .ps1 files to >>>>>>>> exclude the running of the tests? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Paul >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Ken Egozi. >>>> http://www.kenegozi.com/blog >>>> http://www.delver.com >>>> http://www.musicglue.com >>>> http://www.castleproject.org >>>> http://www.idcc.co.il - הכנס הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו >>>> בהמוניכם >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
