Would the overhead be too high to implement this as a filter (endpoint) ? On Mar 20, 8:00 am, Jason Meckley <[email protected]> wrote: > I want to spike validation and authorization of RSB message > processing. I will be using Castle.Validator and Rhino.Security. > Since each command will have validation and authorization I would like > to put the checks outside of the consumer. > > I have used IMessageModule before to manage NH Session but that is > consumer independent so I never had to think about what information > the message(s) contains. For this spike I need access to the message > to validate and authorize. I'm not sure if this logic should be > implemented by an interceptor or message module though. > > an Interceptor will require me to validate the interceptor is > associated with an IMessageConsumer. Easy enough with IOnBehalfAware. > However I could skip this check with a message module. A message > module can process multiple messages in a single transaction and I may > want 1 action to fail while another succeeds. I don't think I can do > that with a message module, at that point processing messages is all > or nothing. with an interceptor i could fail specific consumers and > run another operation (like process failed message, or process > unauthorized request.)
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
