this thought hadn't crossed my mind. how would you see it working per endpoint?
On Mar 21, 3:47 pm, Mike Nichols <[email protected]> wrote: > Would the overhead be too high to implement this as a filter > (endpoint) ? > > On Mar 20, 8:00 am, Jason Meckley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I want to spike validation and authorization of RSB message > > processing. I will be using Castle.Validator and Rhino.Security. > > Since each command will have validation and authorization I would like > > to put the checks outside of the consumer. > > > I have used IMessageModule before to manage NH Session but that is > > consumer independent so I never had to think about what information > > the message(s) contains. For this spike I need access to the message > > to validate and authorize. I'm not sure if this logic should be > > implemented by an interceptor or message module though. > > > an Interceptor will require me to validate the interceptor is > > associated with an IMessageConsumer. Easy enough with IOnBehalfAware. > > However I could skip this check with a message module. A message > > module can process multiple messages in a single transaction and I may > > want 1 action to fail while another succeeds. I don't think I can do > > that with a message module, at that point processing messages is all > > or nothing. with an interceptor i could fail specific consumers and > > run another operation (like process failed message, or process > > unauthorized request.) > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
