That's awesome. How was performance versus the other solution? Also is there visibility into the queue's? I thought tooling support was the lacking feature.
Nathan Palmer On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Corey Kaylor <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought I would share that we recently switched to using rhino queues from > another custom transport (that we made for various unique requirements that > eventually went away). The only change required was a couple lines of > startup code, configuration changes, and referencing the "out of the box" > bus dll's. This change affects 9 different application servers, ~100 client > machines. Overall it was was very painless to make the switch. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
