I join that question On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Nathan Palmer <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's awesome. How was performance versus the other solution? Also is > there visibility into the queue's? I thought tooling support was the > lacking feature. > > Nathan Palmer > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Corey Kaylor <[email protected]> wrote: > > I thought I would share that we recently switched to using rhino queues > from > > another custom transport (that we made for various unique requirements > that > > eventually went away). The only change required was a couple lines of > > startup code, configuration changes, and referencing the "out of the box" > > bus dll's. This change affects 9 different application servers, ~100 > client > > machines. Overall it was was very painless to make the switch. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<rhino-tools-dev%[email protected]> > . > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<rhino-tools-dev%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
