No, providing a fix for something that was put in intentionally would probably not be pulled in.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:41 AM, René M. A <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanx. checked the source code, the limit is hardcoded. > > I realize the message size concern, but I do not think that this specific > limt provides much value? > > If the RSB committers agree with me I can provide a pull request to fix > this? > > If not I can work around it the way you suggest. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rhino-tools-dev/-/13Aa-rAcBugJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
