Corey, If the default limit remained as is but there was a configuration switch to change it, you think that would be something that would get pulled back into the main code base?
On Jun 17, 12:45 pm, Corey Kaylor <[email protected]> wrote: > No, providing a fix for something that was put in intentionally would > probably not be pulled in. > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:41 AM, René M. A > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Thanx. checked the source code, the limit is hardcoded. > > > I realize the message size concern, but I do not think that this specific > > limt provides much value? > > > If the RSB committers agree with me I can provide a pull request to fix > > this? > > > If not I can work around it the way you suggest. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Rhino Tools Dev" group. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > >https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rhino-tools-dev/-/13Aa-rAcBugJ. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino Tools Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhino-tools-dev?hl=en.
