Yes, it does.You can do the same using a Do() in previous versions.
See the documentation for the detaisl

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Ryan Vice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Also, does this require Rhino 3.5?
>
> On Oct 8, 2:08 pm, Ryan Vice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How does that translate to .Net 2.0 syntax?
> >
> > On Oct 8, 1:59 pm, "Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > bool result = false;SetupResult.For( mockObkect.Foo ) .WhenCalled(
> > > invocation=> invocation.ReturnValue = result ) ;
> >
> > > // make calls as usual
> >
> > > result  = true;
> >
> > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Ryan Vice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Hi,
> >
> > > > I have a boolean member variable that I'm using setup results to
> > > > return results from for testing and I need to have it return false
> > > > until after i fire an event and then have it return true.
> >
> > > > Is there a way to do this?
> >
> > > > Thanks- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Rhino.Mocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to