That should work, what are you getting?
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Ryan Vice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can't get it to work. I've put my code below.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Code
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> #region UnableToShoot
>
> /// <summary>
> /// Class for testing DynamiteShooterStateMachine UnableToShoot
> transitions
> /// </summary>
> [TestFixture]
> public class UnableToShoot : DynamiteShooterStateMachineTestsBase
> {
> bool _sourceGroupEnabled;
> delegate bool BoolPropertyDelegate();
>
> [Test]
> public void
> SourceGroupEnabledWithDecoder_ShooterEnabled_UnableToShoot()
> {
> _sourceGroupEnabled = false;
>
> using (_mockRepository.Record())
> {
> _sourceGroup =
> _mockRepository.DynamicMock<ISourceGroup>();
> _sourcePoint = null; // Type is ISourcePoint
> _dynamiteShooterSm =
>
> _mockRepository.PartialMock<DynamiteShooterStateMachineTestHarness>
> (_sourceGroup, _sourcePoint);
> SetupResult.For(_sourceGroup.Name).Return("TestingGroup");
> Expect.Call(_sourceGroup.Enabled).IgnoreArguments()
> .Do(new
> BoolPropertyDelegate(GetSourceGroupEnabled)); // _sourceGroup.Enabled
> is a bool property
> SetupResult.For(_sourceGroup.EnabledWithDecoders)
> .Return(false);
> }
>
> using (_mockRepository.Playback())
> {
> _dynamiteShooterSm.Init();
>
> AssertThatCurrentStateIs(_dynamiteShooterSm.qUnableToShoot);
> _sourceGroupEnabled = true;
> DynamiteShooterStateMachineEvent shooterEnabled
> = new DynamiteShooterStateMachineEvent
> (DynamiteShooterStateMachineSignal.ShooterEnabled,
> _sourceGroup);
> _dynamiteShooterSm.Dispatch(shooterEnabled);
> AssertThatCurrentStateIs(_dynamiteShooterSm.qAbleToShoot);
> }
> }
>
> protected bool GetSourceGroupEnabled()
> {
> return _sourceGroupEnabled;
> }
>
> }
>
>
> On Oct 8, 2:13 pm, "Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, it does.You can do the same using a Do() in previous versions.
> > See the documentation for the detaisl
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:10 PM, Ryan Vice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Also, does this require Rhino 3.5?
> >
> > > On Oct 8, 2:08 pm, Ryan Vice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > How does that translate to .Net 2.0 syntax?
> >
> > > > On Oct 8, 1:59 pm, "Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > bool result = false;SetupResult.For( mockObkect.Foo ) .WhenCalled(
> > > > > invocation=> invocation.ReturnValue = result ) ;
> >
> > > > > // make calls as usual
> >
> > > > > result = true;
> >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Ryan Vice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Hi,
> >
> > > > > > I have a boolean member variable that I'm using setup results to
> > > > > > return results from for testing and I need to have it return
> false
> > > > > > until after i fire an event and then have it return true.
> >
> > > > > > Is there a way to do this?
> >
> > > > > > Thanks- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino.Mocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
