Something like this:
MockRepository repository = new MockRepository();
IStep s1 = repository.DynamicMock<IStep>();
IStep s2 = repository.DynamicMock<IStep>();
using (repository.Ordered())
{
s1.Expect(s => s.Execute());
s2.Expect(s => s.Execute());
}
repository.ReplayAll();
Phase p = new Phase();
p.Add(s1);
p.Add(s2);
p.Run();
repository.VerifyAll();
Iain
2008/11/18 Justin Chase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Suppose I have something like this:
> IStep s1 = MockRepository.GenerateMock<IStep>();
> IStep s2 = MockRepository.GenerateMock<IStep>();
>
> s1.Expect(s => s.Execute());
> s2.Expect(s => s.Execute());
>
> Phase p = new Phase();
> p.Add(s1);
> p.Add(s2);
>
> p.Run();
>
>
> Somewhere in the Run method it will execute the steps. What I would like to
> do is guarantee that the steps are executing in the correct order but I'm
> not sure how to do that. If I swap the order that the expectations are setup
> it still seems to pass the test. Is there an easy way to either, intercept
> the call to Execute() or specify that ordering is important for the
> expectations?
>
> --
> Justin Chase
> http://www.justnbusiness.com
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino.Mocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
