great, thanks!
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Iain Waddell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Something like this:
>
> MockRepository repository = new MockRepository();
> IStep s1 = repository.DynamicMock<IStep>();
> IStep s2 = repository.DynamicMock<IStep>();
>
> using (repository.Ordered())
> {
> s1.Expect(s => s.Execute());
> s2.Expect(s => s.Execute());
> }
> repository.ReplayAll();
>
> Phase p = new Phase();
> p.Add(s1);
> p.Add(s2);
>
> p.Run();
> repository.VerifyAll();
>
> Iain
>
> 2008/11/18 Justin Chase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Suppose I have something like this:
>> IStep s1 = MockRepository.GenerateMock<IStep>();
>> IStep s2 = MockRepository.GenerateMock<IStep>();
>>
>> s1.Expect(s => s.Execute());
>> s2.Expect(s => s.Execute());
>>
>> Phase p = new Phase();
>> p.Add(s1);
>> p.Add(s2);
>>
>> p.Run();
>>
>>
>> Somewhere in the Run method it will execute the steps. What I would like
>> to do is guarantee that the steps are executing in the correct order but I'm
>> not sure how to do that. If I swap the order that the expectations are setup
>> it still seems to pass the test. Is there an easy way to either, intercept
>> the call to Execute() or specify that ordering is important for the
>> expectations?
>>
>> --
>> Justin Chase
>> http://www.justnbusiness.com
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>
--
Justin Chase
http://www.justnbusiness.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Rhino.Mocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
