Yes. The same test case covered by all frameworks available: thus, readability, maintainability, learning curve, specifics and similarities of the frameworks (hopefully) become evident.
In general, the purpose is two-fold: 1. When newbies decide to use a mocking framework, their opinion is often influenced ONLY by "public opinion". This project would help them to dig. 2. When um, more advanced users start talking about which mocking framework is "better", sometimes they garble a bit :) This project could act as a common ground. On Feb 9, 5:58 pm, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote: > Can you explain a little bit what your goal here is? Just visibility? > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:55 AM, andreister <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, I've started a small open source project that provides a unified > > set of tests written against Moq, NMock2, Rhino Mocks and Typemock > > Isolator - so that people can easily compare the frameworks and make > > an informed decision when picking one up. > > > Here it goes:http://code.google.com/p/mocking-frameworks-compare/ > > > Any response and/or ideas are appreciated. > > > (TypeMock tests are not finished because the trial version of Isolator > > had expired and I haven't got their Free License for Open Source > > Projects - yet) > > > [xposted from "Moq Discussions",http://groups.google.com/group/moqdisc] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
