I think it's valuable to have such a thing, and users of all frameworks should contribute to make it a fair comparison following best practices with each.
It could be a helpful resource for people migrating from one framework to another, as well as to decide quickly and side-by-side on the aesthetics merits of each. /kzu -- Daniel Cazzulino | Developer Lead | XML MVP | Clarius Consulting | +1 425.329.3471 On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Tim Barcz <[email protected]> wrote: > Can you explain a little bit what your goal here is? Just visibility? > > > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:55 AM, andreister <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hi, I've started a small open source project that provides a unified >> set of tests written against Moq, NMock2, Rhino Mocks and Typemock >> Isolator - so that people can easily compare the frameworks and make >> an informed decision when picking one up. >> >> Here it goes: http://code.google.com/p/mocking-frameworks-compare/ >> >> Any response and/or ideas are appreciated. >> >> (TypeMock tests are not finished because the trial version of Isolator >> had expired and I haven't got their Free License for Open Source >> Projects - yet) >> >> >> [xposted from "Moq Discussions", http://groups.google.com/group/moqdisc] >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
