Yep, I'm not mocking the SUT (although I do admit that I got confused about this at first too).
Basically, I am wrapping a 3rd party class in my own class so that I can mock it (since that 3rd party class doesn't implement an interface which defines the methods I am interested in, neither are the methods I'm interested in defined as virtual). I'm trying to do it by implementing the wrapper class as a class with virtual methods (rather then a normal class without overridable methods but which implements an interface which defines those methods) - it didn't make sense to me to have the interface simply for the sake of having it... On Jun 18, 11:22 am, Chris Missal <[email protected]> wrote: > Since it's a mock, the dependencies shouldn't matter since you'll be > artificially handling the functionality of the mocked object. > > Be sure that the object you're mocking isn't the class under test, usually > you'll mock the dependencies or the classes that the class under test (or > system under test (SUT)) interacts with, are mocked. > > Make sense? This was a bit confusing for me at first. > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:14 PM, [email protected] <[email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > Sure does. > > > In fact, it doesn't stop me from doing > > > SomeClass c = MockRepository.CreateMock<SomeClass>(null, null); > > > either (the dependencies of SomeClass shouldn't matter in this case > > since it is just a mock). > > > So this problem is not stopping me from using RhinoMocks to mock the > > class, it's just that this behaviour appears to contradict the wiki > > and as this is my first time mocking a class (I have always mocked > > interfaces before), I was worried that I was doing something wrong... > > > On Jun 18, 11:11 am, Chris Missal <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Does it work when you try: > > > > SomeClass c = MockRepository.CreateMock<SomeClass>(a, b); > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:39 PM, [email protected] > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > I'm trying to mock a class that doesn't have a default constructor > > > > (i.e. it has been 'overidden' by a custom constructor which is > > > > parameterized) which - according to the wiki (http://ayende.com/wiki/ > > > > Rhino%20Mocks%20Mocking%20classes.ashx) - should be possible. There > > > > isn't anything particularly special about what I'm trying to do, > > > > simply something like the following: > > > > > public class SomeClass > > > > { > > > > public SomeClass(A a, B b) > > > > { ... } > > > > > virtual public string SomeMethod() > > > > { ... } > > > > } > > > > > [Test] > > > > public void SomeTest() > > > > { > > > > SomeClass c = MockRepository.CreateMock<SomeClass>(); > > > > ... > > > > } > > > > > NUnit reports the following error: > > > > > System.MissingMethodException : Can't find a constructor with matching > > > > arguments > > > > ----> System.MissingMethodException : Constructor on type > > > > 'SomeClass207ade2ffbbc4e7cba459d96ac172bb9' not found. > > > > > cheers! > > > > -- > > > Chris Missalhttp://chrismissal.lostechies.com/ > > -- > Chris Missalhttp://chrismissal.lostechies.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
