That's what I'd do, but I'm not master. :)
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:43 PM, [email protected] <[email protected] > wrote: > > By "extracting an interface from the third party class directly" do > you mean creating a wrapper class which implements an interface which > defines the methods I'm interested in? > > On Jun 18, 11:34 am, Chris Missal <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think it would be easier to mock if you extracted an interface from the > > third party class directly, rather than another class. This way, you > don't > > have to worry about the constructor. > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 PM, [email protected] < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Yep, I'm not mocking the SUT (although I do admit that I got confused > > > about this at first too). > > > > > Basically, I am wrapping a 3rd party class in my own class so that I > > > can mock it (since that 3rd party class doesn't implement an interface > > > which defines the methods I am interested in, neither are the methods > > > I'm interested in defined as virtual). I'm trying to do it by > > > implementing the wrapper class as a class with virtual methods (rather > > > then a normal class without overridable methods but which implements > > > an interface which defines those methods) - it didn't make sense to me > > > to have the interface simply for the sake of having it... > > > > > On Jun 18, 11:22 am, Chris Missal <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Since it's a mock, the dependencies shouldn't matter since you'll be > > > > artificially handling the functionality of the mocked object. > > > > > > Be sure that the object you're mocking isn't the class under test, > > > usually > > > > you'll mock the dependencies or the classes that the class under test > (or > > > > system under test (SUT)) interacts with, are mocked. > > > > > > Make sense? This was a bit confusing for me at first. > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:14 PM, [email protected] < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Sure does. > > > > > > > In fact, it doesn't stop me from doing > > > > > > > SomeClass c = MockRepository.CreateMock<SomeClass>(null, null); > > > > > > > either (the dependencies of SomeClass shouldn't matter in this case > > > > > since it is just a mock). > > > > > > > So this problem is not stopping me from using RhinoMocks to mock > the > > > > > class, it's just that this behaviour appears to contradict the wiki > > > > > and as this is my first time mocking a class (I have always mocked > > > > > interfaces before), I was worried that I was doing something > wrong... > > > > > > > On Jun 18, 11:11 am, Chris Missal <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Does it work when you try: > > > > > > > > SomeClass c = MockRepository.CreateMock<SomeClass>(a, b); > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:39 PM, [email protected] > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to mock a class that doesn't have a default > constructor > > > > > > > (i.e. it has been 'overidden' by a custom constructor which is > > > > > > > parameterized) which - according to the wiki ( > > >http://ayende.com/wiki/ > > > > > > > Rhino%20Mocks%20Mocking%20classes.ashx) - should be possible. > There > > > > > > > isn't anything particularly special about what I'm trying to > do, > > > > > > > simply something like the following: > > > > > > > > > public class SomeClass > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > public SomeClass(A a, B b) > > > > > > > { ... } > > > > > > > > > virtual public string SomeMethod() > > > > > > > { ... } > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > [Test] > > > > > > > public void SomeTest() > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > SomeClass c = MockRepository.CreateMock<SomeClass>(); > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > NUnit reports the following error: > > > > > > > > > System.MissingMethodException : Can't find a constructor with > > > matching > > > > > > > arguments > > > > > > > ----> System.MissingMethodException : Constructor on type > > > > > > > 'SomeClass207ade2ffbbc4e7cba459d96ac172bb9' not found. > > > > > > > > > cheers! > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Chris Missalhttp://chrismissal.lostechies.com/ > > > > > > -- > > > > Chris Missalhttp://chrismissal.lostechies.com/ > > > > -- > > Chris Missalhttp://chrismissal.lostechies.com/ > > > -- Chris Missal http://chrismissal.lostechies.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/RhinoMocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
