I looked at it, but I don't really see the point, to tell you the truth. We already have a really nice syntax for doing property sets (just set the property :-) ), and the rest isn't something really interesting.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Chris Missal <[email protected]>wrote: > Does anybody have any thoughts on adding something like Linq to Moq has? It > seems cool, but I haven't seen the need for something like this yet. > http://www.clariusconsulting.net/blogs/kzu/archive/2009/08/13/164978.aspx > <http://www.clariusconsulting.net/blogs/kzu/archive/2009/08/13/164978.aspx> > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dennis,Rhino Mocks is still active, yes. >> I am actually happy that I am not one of the major contributers, it >> indicates the maturity of the project. >> And yes, I want to release 3.6 sometimes soon, with a bunch of bug fixes >> since 3.5 >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:33 AM, dennisdoomen < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Are there any plans to continue developing Rhino Mocks in the near >>> future? The most recent change by Ayende dates back 6 months. Or >>> should I shift my focus to alternatives like MOQ? >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > -- > Chris Missal > http://chrismissal.lostechies.com/ > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
