I remember a thread a little while ago discussing some sort of cut-down Rhino Mocks version, where all the old syntaxes are removed, and just the AAA syntax is taken forward. Is this something likely to happen Ayende?
2009/8/19 Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> > I looked at it, but I don't really see the point, to tell you the truth. We > already have a really nice syntax for doing property sets (just set the > property :-) ), and the rest isn't something really interesting. > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Chris Missal <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Does anybody have any thoughts on adding something like Linq to Moq has? >> It seems cool, but I haven't seen the need for something like this yet. >> http://www.clariusconsulting.net/blogs/kzu/archive/2009/08/13/164978.aspx >> <http://www.clariusconsulting.net/blogs/kzu/archive/2009/08/13/164978.aspx> >> >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dennis,Rhino Mocks is still active, yes. >>> I am actually happy that I am not one of the major contributers, it >>> indicates the maturity of the project. >>> And yes, I want to release 3.6 sometimes soon, with a bunch of bug fixes >>> since 3.5 >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:33 AM, dennisdoomen < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Are there any plans to continue developing Rhino Mocks in the near >>>> future? The most recent change by Ayende dates back 6 months. Or >>>> should I shift my focus to alternatives like MOQ? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Chris Missal >> http://chrismissal.lostechies.com/ >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rhino.Mocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rhinomocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
