Hi,

Le dimanche 09 juillet 2006 à 13:56 +1000, James "Doc" Livingston a
écrit :
> 
> Finally is the question of what to re-licence to. The minimum change
> required that solves the primary reason for re-licencing would be to
> keep the GPL, but add an exception for GStreamer plugins. Other options
> include: also adding an exception for Rhythmbox plugins, using the LGPL
> so that we could split bits into libraries other application could use,
> etc.

For my part, I'm ok with relicensing, and I don't like the LGPL
relicensing or the "exception for rhythmbox plugins" options (I don't
want to make it easy for people to develop their own proprietary GUI
addons for rhythmbox). So the exception for GStreamer plugins is my
favourite option (even if it prevents us from "stealing" code from GPL
projects :-/). I think this is what totem has done as well.

Christophe

_______________________________________________
rhythmbox-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel

Reply via email to