James "Doc" Livingston wrote: > On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 13:56 +1000, James "Doc" Livingston wrote: >> There was a short discussion on the list, but it petered out because it >> became apparent that no-one was actually planning to ship the plugin at >> that time. > > The discussion seems to have finished again, so we should really do > something if we are going to relicence. > > The general consensus appear to be in favour of re-licencing to GPL with > an exception for GStreamer plugins, and the only objection I think I've > heard being that it would mean we can't "borrow" code from other GPL'd > projects without getting permission to re-licence.
Do we have any idea whether relicensing to GPL+exception would be acceptable to the Red Hat lawyers and actually solve the immediate problem? Jon _______________________________________________ rhythmbox-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rhythmbox-devel
