On 15 Jul 2017, at 01:29, Alexander Sicular <sicul...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not dancing on anyone's grave. Im a big fan of Riak, you know? I'm just 
> pointing out that there is in fact a grave and if there is any hope for a 
> Riak future the project will have to rebrand. 

This is the thing we disagree on. But like I said before, neither of us is a 
lawyer, and even if you’re right, it hardly matters. It’s inconsequential.

> 
> I'm sorry, but no company in their right mind would seriously consider using 
> Riak today if they weren't already using Riak. That's today, the story may 
> change tomorrow. 

Again, I disagree, but I’m personally not that interested in looking for new 
Riak users at the moment. I think now is the time to shore up the existing 
customers who want to stay with Riak. Chasing non-existent new business whilst 
ignoring the core users is a large part of what did for Basho.

> 
> 
>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Russell Brown <russell.br...@mac.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 14 Jul 2017, at 23:36, Dave King <djk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> You asked what difference the tm made.  The tm invokes clause 6.  So yes it 
>>> means moving forward means a new name.  That's one of the things to be 
>>> considered.
>> 
>> Agree, so if we’re sticking to the subject, “Is Riak dead?” the worst case 
>> is: “No, but potentially the name could be some time in the future”, right?
>> 
>> I asked rhetorically what difference the TM made. I’ve also read the 
>> license, and taken legal advice. This was not in any way a surprise.
>> 
>>> 
>>> - Peace
>>> Dave
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Russell Brown <russell.br...@mac.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 14 Jul 2017, at 23:28, Dave King <djk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> No, but I can read.
>>> 
>>> I read it too. I’m not sure what your point is. A day may come when the 
>>> name has to change?
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> - Peace
>>>> Dave
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Russell Brown <russell.br...@mac.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 14 Jul 2017, at 23:26, Dave King <djk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade 
>>>>> names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, 
>>>>> except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the 
>>>>> origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
>>>>> 
>>>>> So At minimum I read that as there would need to be a new product name, 
>>>>> and the docs for that product could say formerly known as Riak.
>>>> 
>>>> You are lawyer?
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Peace
>>>>> Dave
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Russell Brown <russell.br...@mac.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 14 Jul 2017, at 23:17, Dave King <djk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Looks like Basho has the trademark on Riak.
>>>>>> http://www.trademarkia.com/riak-77954950.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> They sure do. And if you look at the Apache2 license you’ll see that it 
>>>>> grants use of the name to identify the source.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Look, I’m not a lawyer, and I’m guessing you’re not a lawyer. What 
>>>>> difference does the name or trademark make? There are a bunch of active 
>>>>> users of Riak, some of whom have made it clear they plan to continue 
>>>>> using it. Dance on Basho’s grave all you want, but Riak isn’t dead yet.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> - Peace
>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Alexander Sicular <sicul...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 2017, at 11:32, Russell Brown <russell.br...@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What do you mean “encumbered”? Riak is the name of an Apache2 licensed 
>>>>>>> open source database, so it can continue to be used to describe that 
>>>>>>> apache 2 licensed database, please don’t spread FUD.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You willing to invest time in a project that could be legally encumbered 
>>>>>> at some point in the future because lawyers? You willing to put that 
>>>>>> beyond the clown fiesta that is Basho? I don't think so.
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> riak-users mailing list
>>>>>> riak-users@lists.basho.com
>>>>>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> 


_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to