What's at Stake in Wisconsin'​s Budget Battle
Doug Fiedor
[email protected] 
 
It's interesting to note that some people take positions in government as 
"public servants" and then organize as a union to negotiate against the 
'public' they profess to serve.  

Today, one such union, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal 
Employees, appears to be little more than a socialist front organization.  A 
harsh statement, you think?  Maybe.  So let's judge them by their deeds rather 
than their words:  The AFSCME headquarters in Detroit has hosted the national 
Socialist Party convention a few times and AFSCME is well known for offering 
major support for the far left candidates for government office.  So, how do 
you think they fit in with how the average American citizen thinks government 
employees should behave in our Constitutional Republic? 

As reported:  "collective bargaining has so 'greatly increased the political 
influence of unions' that they block the sorts of necessary change that other 
elements of society have had to accept . . .  too many government workers enjoy 
wages, benefits and pensions that are out of line with the rest of the 
economy." 

These government worker's unions have not only grown very greedy, they 
constantly feather their nest by becoming active political campaigners, working 
to get far left people elected to office who will give government workers even 
more money and benefits.  Consequently, this has grown way out of hand and must 
now be pared back significantly. 

Finally, a governor dares take on the very powerful unions and suggest a few 
changes that will help the reign in the out of control spending in his state.  
But, in doing so, he received the wrath of all of the far left organizations 
around the nation. 

Are we going to support Governor Scott Walker -- and by doing so get the ball 
rolling in our state, too --  or shall we sit back while these far left groups 
again exert control over the political process and bleed our state budgets even 
more? 

Anyone watching closely notices that the unions and other far left 
organizations are demonstrating their normal way:  Using Rent-a-Mobs.  
Organizing for America, and other far left groups, are actually rounding up 
protesters anyplace they can get them to demonstrate in Madison.  

Well . . . follow the money trail, folks.  Someone is paying big bucks for all 
this to happen.  Sure, the unions are ponying up some.  But, there is much more 
being spent than just the normal union 'walking around' and campaign money.  
Not only are they paying for buses, food and lodging for their Rent-a-Mob, 
someone is also footing the bill for a few hundred well paid writers to publish 
union-favorable articles around the country. 

This could be the last ditch effort by the socialist unions.  Because, as soon 
as the average American voter realizes exactly what is happening, and who is 
paying for this union demonstration, there will be a political backlash that 
these government unions will never recover from. 

And those federal workers better shut up, too!  Few people remember that it was 
President John Kennedy who allowed federal workers to organize against the 
American people.  That can, and should, be changed just as fast as it 
happened.  

Yes, it truly is 'time for change'.  Indeed it is!  And it appears that 
Governor Scott Walker is walking point in that change.  Let's not leave him 
hanging out there alone.  Do whatever you can to back him up. 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014240527487049000045
76152172777557748.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h

What's at Stake in Wisconsin's Budget Battle 
Who's in charge of our political system—voters or unions?
By JOHN FUND
FEBRUARY 19, 2011

This week President Obama was roundly criticized, even by many of his allies, 
for submitting a federal budget that actually increases our already crushing 
deficit.  But that didn't stop him Thursday from jumping into Wisconsin's 
titanic budget battle.  He accused the new Republican governor, Scott Walker, 
of launching an "assault" on unions with his emergency legislation aimed at 
cutting the state budget. 

The real assault this week was led by Organizing for America, the successor to 
President's Obama's 2008 campaign organization.  It helped fill buses of 
protesters who flooded the state capital of Madison and ran 15 phone banks 
urging people to call state legislators. 

Mr. Walker's proposals are hardly revolutionary.  Facing a $137 million budget 
deficit, he has decided to try to avoid laying off 5,500 state workers by 
proposing that they contribute 5.8% of their income towards their pensions and 
12.6% towards health insurance. That's roughly the national average for public 
pension payments, and it is less than half the national average of what 
government workers contribute to health care. Mr. Walker also wants to limit 
the power of public-employee unions to negotiate contracts and work 
rules—something that 24 states already limit or ban.
The governor's move is in reaction to a 2009 law implemented by the 
then-Democratic legislature that expanded public unions' collective-bargaining 
rights and lifted existing limits on teacher raises. 

Democratic reactions to these proposals have been over the top. In addition to 
the thousands of protesters who descended on the Capitol building on Thursday 
to intimidate legislators, so many teachers called in sick on Friday that 
school districts in Milwaukee, Madison and Janesville had to close. 

Then there's the rhetoric.  "This is about the clean government Wisconsin has 
enjoyed over the past century versus the corrupt government that Scott Walker 
proposes," thundered the liberal Madison Capital Times newspaper earlier this 
week.  Democratic State Sen. Bob Jauch called Mr. Walker's move "the end of the 
democratic process" during the committee debate on Wednesday night.

But when it became obvious that the governor had the votes to pass it, Mr. 
Jauch and his 13 Democratic colleagues got on a bus and fled the state to 
deprive Republicans of a sufficient quorum to conduct any legislative 
business.  They were later found at a Best Western Hotel in Rockford, Ill.  
Scot Ross, director of the liberal activist group One Wisconsin Now, endorsed 
the temper tantrum: "The senators have rightfully taken matters into their own 
hands."

Why are national liberal groups treating Wisconsin as if it were their last 
stand?  Partly for reasons of symbolism.  Historically, Wisconsin "embraced the 
organized labor movement more heartily than any other [state]," notes liberal 
activist Abe Sauer. 

The Badger State became the first to pass a worker-compensation program in 
1911, as well as the first to create unemployment compensation in 1932.  The 
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees—the chief national 
union representing non-federal public employees—was founded in Madison in 
1936.  And in 1959, Wisconsin became the first state to grant public employees 
collective-bargaining rights, which influenced President John F. Kennedy's 
decision to grant federal employees the right to join unions three years later. 
Labor historian Fred Siegel offers further reasons why unions are manning the 
barricades.  Mr. Walker would require that public-employee unions be 
recertified annually by a majority vote of all their members, not merely by a 
majority of those that choose to cast ballots.  In addition, he would end the 
government's practice of automatically deducting union dues from employee 
paychecks.  For Wisconsin teachers, union dues total between $700 and $1,000 a 
year. 

"Ending dues deductions breaks the political cycle in which government collects 
dues, gives them to the unions, who then use the dues to back their favorite 
candidates and also lobby for bigger government and more pay and benefits," Mr. 
Siegel told me.  After New York City's Transport Workers Union lost the right 
to automatic dues collection in 2007 following an illegal strike, its income 
fell by more than 35% as many members stopped ponying up.  New York City ended 
the dues collection ban after 18 months. 

Myron Lieberman, a former Minnesota public school teacher who became a contract 
negotiator for the American Federation of Teachers, says that since the 1960s 
collective bargaining has so "greatly increased the political influence of 
unions" that they block the sorts of necessary change that other elements of 
society have had to accept. 

The labor laws that Wisconsin unions are so bitterly defending were popular 
during an era of industrialization and centralization.  But the labor 
organizations they protect have become much less popular, as the declining 
membership of many private-sector unions attests.  Moreover, it's become 
abundantly clear that too many government workers enjoy wages, benefits and 
pensions that are out of line with the rest of the economy. 

Mr. Walker's argument—that public workers shouldn't be living high off the hog 
at the expense of taxpayers—is being made in other states facing budget 
crises.  But the left observed the impact of the tea party last year and seems 
determined to unleash a more aggressive version of its own by teaming up with 
union allies.  Organizing for America is already coordinating protests against 
proposed reforms in Ohio, Michigan and Missouri.

Mr. Fund is a columnist for WSJ.com.


 
Check out Doug's website
http://fiedorreport.blogspot.com/




      

-- 
To join RichsRants, send email to: 
[email protected]

For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/richsrants?hl=en

Reply via email to