Correct me if I am wrong, as I often am, but if I am not mistaken Moorman's was acquired by ADM just this past Fall. How is it that a representative of ADM is referring in a posessive manner to their (meaning ADM) programs being assocaited (if not implied causal) for Tevis wins over the past 3 years? If we accept that Moormans products was pivitol to those successes, are their products equally at fault for the failures of horses using their products who did not win? Bottom line I see someone using their title and their company's recent acquisition to promote a commercial interest. Although not precluded, I think most RC people eschew blantant commercialism.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
