>And yes, the measurements have been done. Well, let me predict the future of the coming paper : high citation level guaranteed, even if there is nothing more than a refinement of the known structure. I would call Science : a new theory explaining, and allowing to predict that a defined compound would be superconductor, evenmore, able to predict the superconducting temperature. That science would be nobelizable, undoubtedly I would not call Science giving the MgB2 atomic coordinates, already known. Best, Armel
- Most cited powder diffraction papers Armel Le Bail
- RE: Most cited powder diffraction papers Radaelli, PG (Paolo)
- RE: Most cited powder diffraction papers Armel Le Bail
- RE: Most cited powder diffraction papers Alan Hewat
- RE: Most cited powder diffraction paper... Armel Le Bail
- Neutron diffraction with boron Brian H. Toby
- RE: Neutron diffraction with boron aka ... E. K. Akdogan
- Re: Neutron diffraction with boron ... N. Dragoe
- Re: Neutron diffraction with boron Armel Le Bail
- Re: Neutron diffraction with boron Jonathan WRIGHT
- Re: Neutron diffraction with b... Armel Le Bail
- Re: Neutron diffraction wi... Alan Hewat
- Re: Neutron diffractio... Armel Le Bail
- Re: Neutron diffractio... Jonathan WRIGHT
- Re: Neutron diffractio... Armel Le Bail
- RE: Neutron diffraction wi... E. K. Akdogan
- RE: Neutron diffractio... Peter Y. Zavalij
- RE: Neutron diffractio... E. K. Akdogan
- RE: Most cited powder diffraction papers Radaelli, PG (Paolo)
