Dear colleagues,
I apologize in advance for attaching a file but I cannot share my
astonishment without it.

With so many advanced pieces of equipment for powder diffraction data
collection spread all over the world and so many nice pieces of software
written to handle (and interpret) powder diffraction data I was truly
astonished to see the attached capture of a figure containing powder
patterns ready to be published next September 2015 in a reputable
international peer-reviewed journal that usually publishes x-ray data, as a
proof of phase purity for x<0.4 samples...

It´s truly unimportant what is the journal or who are the authors (I can
provide the reference if anyone wants it, though), but could anyone think
any interesting conclusions can be extracted from samples characterized in
this way?

Are there referees ready to accept these patterns as proof of anything?

Shouldn´t the IUCr take action and try to influence the journals that
frequently publish x-ray data (as a complementary characterization
technique but that determines the validity of other results) to have
well-trained crystallographers review any article that contains x-ray
diffraction data?

This is not the first time I face this kind of powder patterns in the
published literature, that´s why I worry more and more every day.

With best regards,
Leo


-- 
Dr. Leopoldo Suescun
Prof. Agr (Assoc. Prof.) de Física       Tel: (+598) 29290705/29249859
Cryssmat-Lab./DETEMA                             Fax: (+598) 29241906*
Facultad de Quimica, Universidad de la Republica
  ,_.
  |  \
  |   v-
 ,'     \
 |      (
 \__Montevideo, Uruguay

En pleno disfrute del Año Internacional de la Cristalografía 2014 (
http://www.iycr2014.org ),  (http://www.cristalografia2014.fq.edu.uy)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to