Seems like that figure is out of content! In phase transformation and a high time resolution studies you will come across something like that.
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Matthew Rowles <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Kurt > > Maybe the paper by Bridget Ingham would be of interest: Statistical measures > of spotiness in diffraction rings. > > Just an idea. > > Matthew > > Hi all, > > In my defense, 10 of the 12 messages relating to this topic have had their > footers attached. I will try to figure out how to get rid of it for next > time. > > Here is a topic I am interested in: we are collecting a lot of data on an > imaging plate (GSECARS and HPCAT at Advanced Photon Source). We are > interested in splitting of peaks in some of the samples. The splitting is > very difficult to see on the integrated pattern, but very easy to see on the > 2-D imaging plate frame itself. The rings are "spotty" and it's very easy > to tell which spots are in which ring when the peak is slightly split. > > My question is whether there is software I can use to take advantage of this > and fit the "spots" so I can get a better resolution of the splitting. > Something in between powder and single crystal. > > Thank you, > > - Kurt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry Finger [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Larry Finger > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 9:58 AM > To: Kurt Leinenweber; Alan Hewat; Leopoldo Suescun > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: regress in crystallographic good practices and knowledge > > On 05/08/2015 11:16 AM, Kurt Leinenweber wrote: >> Hi Alan, >> >> I still like the Rietveld list and do read all the posts. >> >> Is it possible to block attachments so that people can’t attach files any >> more? >> >> -Kurt > > Thus writes the guy whose mailer blindly attaches a message footer rather > than in-lining a signature. :) > > Although I no longer practice crystallography, and no longer read the > literature, I do find the discussions here of interest. At least I can > follow how little crystallography the average solid-state researcher > actually knows. > Sad to know that bugs in a few programs could completely derail the science. > All the greats of the early part of the 20th century must be really spinning > in their graves! > > Larry > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <[email protected]> > Send commands to <[email protected]> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text > The Rietveld_L list archive is on > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <[email protected]> > Send commands to <[email protected]> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text > The Rietveld_L list archive is on > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > -- Sincerely
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <[email protected]> Send commands to <[email protected]> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
