>That's weird, they're supposed to go to your tmp dir, not the webapps
>dir. Can you give more details about the OS, version number, tomcat
>version, JDK version, ... that you're using?
WindowsXP Pro SP2
RIFE 1.4
Tomcat 5.0.28
JDK 1.5.08
On Jun 2, 12:32 am, "Geert Bevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thank you David and Geert,
> > I deployed a couple RIFE examples in my Tomcat5.0 container and I
> > found the following dirs under webapps dir directly :
> > rife_elements
> > rife_localhost_8080_
> > What are these ?
> > Are they supposed to appear under webapps dir ?
> > How to move them to another dir ?
>
> That's weird, they're supposed to go to your tmp dir, not the webapps
> dir. Can you give more details about the OS, version number, tomcat
> version, JDK version, ... that you're using?
>
> > A question about templates.
> > RIFE templates are supposed to be designer friendly.
> > Well, all RIFE special markup (<!--V 'PARAM:paramName'/--> for
> > example) are displayed in the HTML page using a web browser which I
> > think this confuses the page designer.
> > Tapestry and Wicket templates are much more elegant IMHO.
>
> Sadly this is a recurrent theme. RIFE's templates are as
> designer-friendly as Tapestry and Wickets, they're just much more fine
> grained. The others expect a DOM-like structure and latch onto that.
> RIFE treats templates just as text, any text, and allows you to split
> it up as you want with blocks and place value tags where needed. If
> those happen to fall at locations that aren't designer friendly, then
> you have to consider if you want to make the trade-off or not. I'm not
> sure that I correctly phrasing what I want to say, but in the others
> you tie yourself to one particular tag with an attribute that gives it
> an ID. That's not different from surrounding the HTML tag with a block
> tag in a RIFE template. The difference is that with RIFE you can
> decide to template invalid HTML code, email messages, SQL, ...
> anything. Also, if you're putting a value tag inside HTML attributes
> like href, you might want to look at the template tag alternatives,
> the ${} syntax is much more effective there
> (http://rifers.org/wiki/display/RIFE/Alternative+tag+syntax). That
> makes designers happier.
>
> > Any way, I begin to fall in love with RIFE.
> > Thank you Geert for this piece of art. :)
>
> Thanks for the compliments, hope you find what you need with it :-)
>
> --
> Geert Bevin
> Terracotta -http://www.terracotta.org
> Uwyn "Use what you need" -http://uwyn.com
> RIFE Java application framework -http://rifers.org
> Music and words -http://gbevin.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"rife-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rife-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
