Hmm, RIFE 1.4, can you try upgrading to at least RIFE 1.5.1 ?
On 6/2/07, LoneWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >That's weird, they're supposed to go to your tmp dir, not the webapps
> >dir. Can you give more details about the OS, version number, tomcat
> >version, JDK version, ... that you're using?
> WindowsXP Pro SP2
> RIFE 1.4
> Tomcat 5.0.28
> JDK 1.5.08
>
> On Jun 2, 12:32 am, "Geert Bevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Thank you David and Geert,
> > > I deployed a couple RIFE examples in my Tomcat5.0 container and I
> > > found the following dirs under webapps dir directly :
> > > rife_elements
> > > rife_localhost_8080_
> > > What are these ?
> > > Are they supposed to appear under webapps dir ?
> > > How to move them to another dir ?
> >
> > That's weird, they're supposed to go to your tmp dir, not the webapps
> > dir. Can you give more details about the OS, version number, tomcat
> > version, JDK version, ... that you're using?
> >
> > > A question about templates.
> > > RIFE templates are supposed to be designer friendly.
> > > Well, all RIFE special markup (<!--V 'PARAM:paramName'/--> for
> > > example) are displayed in the HTML page using a web browser which I
> > > think this confuses the page designer.
> > > Tapestry and Wicket templates are much more elegant IMHO.
> >
> > Sadly this is a recurrent theme. RIFE's templates are as
> > designer-friendly as Tapestry and Wickets, they're just much more fine
> > grained. The others expect a DOM-like structure and latch onto that.
> > RIFE treats templates just as text, any text, and allows you to split
> > it up as you want with blocks and place value tags where needed. If
> > those happen to fall at locations that aren't designer friendly, then
> > you have to consider if you want to make the trade-off or not. I'm not
> > sure that I correctly phrasing what I want to say, but in the others
> > you tie yourself to one particular tag with an attribute that gives it
> > an ID. That's not different from surrounding the HTML tag with a block
> > tag in a RIFE template. The difference is that with RIFE you can
> > decide to template invalid HTML code, email messages, SQL, ...
> > anything. Also, if you're putting a value tag inside HTML attributes
> > like href, you might want to look at the template tag alternatives,
> > the ${} syntax is much more effective there
> > (http://rifers.org/wiki/display/RIFE/Alternative+tag+syntax). That
> > makes designers happier.
> >
> > > Any way, I begin to fall in love with RIFE.
> > > Thank you Geert for this piece of art. :)
> >
> > Thanks for the compliments, hope you find what you need with it :-)
> >
> > --
> > Geert Bevin
> > Terracotta -http://www.terracotta.org
> > Uwyn "Use what you need" -http://uwyn.com
> > RIFE Java application framework -http://rifers.org
> > Music and words -http://gbevin.com
>
>
> >
>
--
Geert Bevin
Terracotta - http://www.terracotta.org
Uwyn "Use what you need" - http://uwyn.com
RIFE Java application framework - http://rifers.org
Music and words - http://gbevin.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"rife-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rife-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
