On 9/15/05, Geert Bevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Instead of
> >     protected String validSchemas[] { "DocBook", "DITA", "XHTML" };
> >     public    void   setSchema(String s) { .. ]
> >     public    String getSchema() { .. }
> >
> > I'd like to say something like
> >
> >     @property("readwrite")
> >     @enumerated("DocBook","DITA","XHTML")
> >     @widget("combobox","editable=false") // true iff can define a
> > new value
> >     String schema;
> >
> > Does this make any sense ?  I'm sure I'm overlookin a zilliion
> > issues here.  But if the class declared the form fields it needs,
> > and then the class was bound to an HTML form, the forms engine
> > might be able to crank out a lot of boilerplate.
> 
> I don't think this is the right layer to declare widget usage in.
> Imho you should set in the template which widget is used for what.

So are you thinking something like: 

<!--V 'ELEMENT:com.uwyn.rife.widgets.CalendarWidget'/-->

and then the various inputs/outputs/submissions are detected?

> 
> --
> Geert Bevin                       Uwyn bvba
> "Use what you need"               Avenue de Scailmont 34
> http://www.uwyn.com               7170 Manage, Belgium
> gbevin[remove] at uwyn dot com    Tel +32 64 84 80 03
> 
> PGP Fingerprint : 4E21 6399 CD9E A384 6619  719A C8F4 D40D 309F D6A9
> Public PGP key  : available at servers pgp.mit.edu, wwwkeys.pgp.net
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rife-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
> 



-- 
JR Boyens
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Rife-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users

Reply via email to