Hi Steven,
thanks a lot for having added this. I have a few remarks:
* adding the ID in the XML isn't needed and can actually confuse RIFE
since it doesn't know which ID belongs to which implementation class
when you refer to the class. In your case (since you just use the
short class name), you can leave the ID out completely. If you what
to add one, it's best to do so in annotations.
* you don't have to prefix the URLs with a /, RIFE does that
automatically for you
* the destClassIdPrefix doesn't have to end with a dot, RIFE does
that automatically for you
* it might be more appropriate to use related IDs for
destClassIdPrefix instead of absolute ones in case you integrate your
elements in other sites: ^Admin
That's it :-)
Take care,
Geert
On 12 Jul 2006, at 06:40, Steven Grimm wrote:
Sure thing! I've added a section to that page, with a bunch of
additional explanatory text which will hopefully be helpful to
people who aren't too familiar with RIFE's annotations. Comments
(or edits) welcome, naturally.
-Steve
Tyler Pitchford wrote:
Steven,
Could you add your Annotations information to the Best Practices
page in the wiki? I'd like to start using your format (seems to
reduce
some clutter), but I'm not 100% sure on what your site.xml ends up
looking like.
Thanks,
Tyler
_______________________________________________
Rife-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
--
Geert Bevin
Uwyn "Use what you need" - http://uwyn.com
RIFE Java application framework - http://rifers.org
Music and words - http://gbevin.com
_______________________________________________
Rife-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
