Geert Bevin wrote:
* adding the ID in the XML isn't needed and can actually confuse RIFE since it doesn't know which ID belongs to which implementation class when you refer to the class. In your case (since you just use the short class name), you can leave the ID out completely. If you what to add one, it's best to do so in annotations.
Then how do you distinguish between two elements that use the same implementation class? You mentioned before that this is a common situation (though I don't personally do it yet.) You could presumably have two different element instances with different properties specified in the XML configuration.
The other points are good and I will update the document (and my own source code) to reflect them.
-Steve _______________________________________________ Rife-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.uwyn.com/mailman/listinfo/rife-users
