On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 09:58:16AM +0100, Brian Nisbet wrote: > I think this may be an elegant solution. I am slightly suspicious of any > new piece of work which is supposed to be lightweight and is then given > to already busy people, as it has a habit of spiralling. > > I would also welcome your thoughts on managing the difference between > the term lengths of the two different posts? > > That said, I don't think these are reasons to oppose your proposal, I > just want to make sure they've been thought about.
I'm mostly with Brian here. Hans Petter's suggestion works well for seeding but the question should be up for review one year into the committee members' terms to identify incompatibilities or synergies arising from the "personal union" approach. -Peter
