Hans Petter, all -
On 23.09.2015 07:13, Hans Petter Holen wrote:
> On 21.09.15 10.58, Brian Nisbet wrote:
>>
>> I think this may be an elegant solution. I am slightly suspicious of
>> any new piece of work which is supposed to be lightweight and is then
>> given to already busy people, as it has a habit of spiralling.
> The NRO-NC already has the following responsibilities as ASO AC
> according to 3b in the MOU with ICANN:
> https://archive.icann.org/en/aso/aso-mou-29oct04.htm
> * a role in Global policy development
> * make recommendations to the ICANN board on new LIRs
> * selecting ICANN board member two out of three years
> * make their own procedures
>
> The work of the review committee is to give advice on IANA performance
> for the numbers community. We do not have any experience with how much
> work this is going to be, but if we look at the work IANA does for
> numbers - it is in the range of one request every second month on
> average. So I would assume reading trough the monthly reports once or
> twice a year and checking that the
>
> Personally I would imagine that this added workload is more than
> manageable.
>
>>
>> I would also welcome your thoughts on managing the difference between
>> the term lengths of the two different posts?
> Thats a good point.
> I will propose that we modify the terms of the review committee to match
> the ones of the NRO-NC.
sounds all reasonable to me. I support this.
Best,
-C.
