Hi, On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 05:59:48AM +0000, Andy Davidson wrote: > This is not consensus building. This is not suitable methodology from the > Chair. This is disingenuous.
The NomCom has been put in a very difficult situation here.
We have a document that tells us what to do. We do that.
In the middle of the road, concerns are voiced that the document is not
good enough - which might be a valid statement or not, but how should it
affect the current process, given the simultaneously expressed support for
all the persons involved?
> I would ask those wishing to contribute to this thread to read the
> ripe-chair-discuss thread to familiarise themselves with the complaint.
>
> The pool of talent in the RIPE community is sufficiently large
> enough to mean that the independence of the NCC and Community can
> be preserved through having different people contribute to the work
> of our committees, working-groups, and leadership teams; to say or
> to behave that this is not the case demonstrates contempt.
We do have a good set of very talented and widely recognized nominees.
Would it be good to have a wider selection? Maybe.
Have all these other people of talent come forward and volunteered? No.
What shall we do?
Gert Doering
-- member of the NomCom.
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
