> On 26 May 2020, at 09:49, Sander Steffann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Jim, you then go on to quote directly from RFC7282 which says very clearly >> that the concerns DO need to be addressed. > > Jim quoted it the wrong way around: concerns have to be addressed, but not > accommodated.
Correct. You all know what I meant anyway: we already have rough consensus for the status quo. Thanks Sander.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
