> On 9 Feb 2021, at 12:49, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Even if only me see those problems (which again is not the case, according to > WGCC summary), still there is a chance that with the discussion of the > proposal others support it and we can find a point where objections are > invalid. This is what consensus mean. It does not mean that. You are wrong. Please read RFC7282. I quote: "Consensus is when everyone is sufficiently satisfied with the chosen solution, such that they no longer have specific objections to it.” Everyone is not sufficiently satisfied with your proposal(s) - QED - so by definition there cannot be a consensus for them.
- [ripe-list] RIPE Working Group Chair Co... Mirjam Kuehne
- Re: [ripe-list] RIPE Working Group... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
- Re: [ripe-list] RIPE Working G... Gert Doering
- Re: [ripe-list] RIPE Worki... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
- Re: [ripe-list] RIPE W... Gert Doering
- Re: [ripe-list] R... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
- [ripe-list] c... Jim Reid
- Re: [ripe... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
- Re: [ripe-list] RIPE Working G... Jim Reid
- Re: [ripe-list] RIPE Worki... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
- [ripe-list] %1-JORDI-E... Job Snijders
- Re: [ripe-list] %... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
- Re: [ripe-lis... Peter Koch
- Re: [ripe... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
- Re: [ripe-lis... Ondřej Surý
- Re: [ripe-list] RIPE W... Leo Vegoda
- Re: [ripe-list] R... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list
