On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:01:49PM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via ripe-list wrote: > You can't declare consensus in something that was developed by a TF > that discriminated even a single participant from being part of the > TF.
Consensus is not unanimity. And task forces or workgroups have no inherent need to include everyone. In fact, consensus decision-making tries to cope with social situations where a few participants are unable or unwilling to learn, understand and adhere to established (by consensus) social interaction parameters. Since I have no relevant standing and no reputational damage to fear, I will just go and opine that you, JORDI, fall into that category. It is my impression that you might be unable to participate in a constructive manner. I am regretfully not skilled in how to express this in a way that may help you more to address this. If I were, I certainly would. I would also like to point out that the tolerance you've enjoyed hitherto can have negative impact and costs in alienating others from participating in this forum. I do not have the necessary insight to make that determination but am painfully aware and afraid of the possibility. -David (I have said my piece and will not be reading or responding in any manner on this matter, neither on-list nor on any other channel. I'm pretty close to being alienated-out myself here.) -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ripe-list
