Alex,
many of your points *are* already addressed by the document:
On 14/09/2022 15:57, Alex de Joode wrote:
-- you need to know what you are accused of (and by whom) (*)
> -- you need to be able to defend yourself
"3. Report is Assessed
Depending on the nature of the report, elements of the assessment
process may include (but are not limited to):
Contacting the subject of the report to hear their side of the story"
> -- you need to know how the coc team came to a decision
"4. Decision is Made" describes this;
+ "subject of the report should be informed."
-- you need to be able to appeal this. (third party arbitration?)
"5. Outcomes are Applied
People who dispute the outcome of a report can contact the CoC Team to
make an appeal. ... a different group of CoC Team members must review
the case."
Or, maybe the next step could be the (existing) "Arbitration Process":
https://www.ripe.net/about-us/legal/arbitration/arbitration-process
(*) "And by whom" is tricky...
In case of "minor" offenses, This is not necessary to reveal.
In case of more serious / personal harm occurring, hiding identity of
the victim is often used to protect the victim from further trauma.
Alternative approach I've heard of is geared towards protecting
*community*, and revealing identity of the victim - with the goal to
dispense with exactly _these_ kinds of discussions we are having now,
making it easier to keep the offenders out of the community, in order to
prevent *NEXT* victims of being hurt in the future... even if this
hurts the existing victim again :(
Vesna
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ripe-list
