Hi, In APNIC region, approach is "pay as you grow", that is, members pay as per their allocation size (https://www.apnic.net/get-ip/apnic-membership/how-much-does-it-cost/) , which i think is the most practical way to do so in RIR scenario.
What i like the most after reading this article, is that RIPE NCC members have the options to raise a questions (and even to send the proposal in the bin) on the board proposal, whereas APNIC board unilaterally decides the hike in the membership fees last year and there was no discussion at all prior to the decision. Kudos to RIPE NCC for hearing the members voice before taking any unilateral decision. Regards, Gaurav Kansal On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 6:49 PM Remco van Mook <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear colleagues, > > I’d like to draw your attention to an article that was just published on RIPE > Labs, about building a stable future for the RIPE NCC. > > As it touches on some very foundational aspects all across the various > working groups and NCC membership, I thought it important to share, and I > would very much like to ask everyone for their input and ideas. > > In order to not spread the discussion too much across the various mailing > lists, I suggest that we use the general RIPE list (which I’ve put into the > reply-to field of this email. > > I’m currently in the process of organising a BOF during RIPE 88 on this topic > as well and am looking forward to a constructive discussion! > > Kind regards, > > Remco van Mook > RIPE NCC Executive Board > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ripe-list -- Thanks and Regards, Gaurav Kansal 9910118448 -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ripe-list
