InTheBath wrote: > A 216Gb library in WMA lossless ended up being 224Gb in flac - this was > using best (slowest) compression in dbpoweramp. One up for Microsoft.
224/216 = 1.037037037 So its a 3.70 percent increase. While I expect that WMA may be a bit tighter, this is pretty close to identical in the practical world. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
