radish wrote: > SC supports both track-per-file and track-per-disc, but given the > apparent lack of standards in the world of cue files I see plenty of > problems with them. Personally I use track-per-file, it makes sense to > me and it always works flawlessly with SC.
thanks; so gapless playback isn't an issue with file-per-track? And presumably keeping a CUE sheet around isn't going to do any harm, either? I'm just trying to keep my options open. If I wanted to burn an exact copy of the original CD, can I still do that with file-per-track, or has that lost some info? e.g. lead-in/out, track gaps, etc? cheers, calum. _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/ripping
