>as is often the case, you look at users from the POV of how they SHOULD >be, esp to work with how SBS is now; whereas i look at users as how they >come to SBS, and what, if anything, can SBS do to work better with them >as is. > Yeah, right!
>as aubuti noted, 1/1 implies there are no other discs. But disc=<blank> implies the songs were not on a disk. If there were tracks 1, 2, 3, and another file with no track, I wouldn't assume track 4, because track=<blank> means no track number. Similarly if all songs had genre=Rock, except for one that was blank, I wouldn't assume it was a rock track. If anything, it would be better to assume that disk=1/1 means no disk, rather than disk=<blank> was meant to be 1/1. But assuming that <blank> was actually meant to be something else gives the user no way to override that behaviour. eg. if you want a song to have no disk number (for whatever reason). >anyway, i find it kind of amusing you "don't like special cases" but >have no problem with SBS having a special case category name that >conflicts with tons of mainstream apps and tagging sources and makes >such tagged music missing from SBS view. not trying to open that can of >worms, but had to mention it. Thought you would. It's totally different, but I'm not making a comment again on that. _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/ripping
