Ponzu = PPNZ. Silly spell checker.

On 3/03/2013, at 14:40, Gavin Stephens <[email protected]> wrote:

> Only if you make over $10,000 I think. I haven't heard of anyone having to 
> file an actual report under the $250 license or ponzu. But I too have been 
> watching with keen interest for this.
> 
> On 3/03/2013, at 13:03, "Paul Hayton" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi folks I have a question hopefully someone can help me with?
>> 
>> How can I can add / remove fields that are output to the new 'music playout'
>> report that first appears in v2.4.0?
>> 
>> I'm looking to modify it so I can meet APRA reporting requirements for New
>> Zealand low power FM broadcasters as outlined below:
>> 
>> ---
>> 
>> The Licensee will:
>> 
>> At APRA's reasonable request, furnish to APRA a certified list of each and
>> every
>> musical work communicated without any exceptions or omissions whatsoever 
>> 
>> Such lists shall:
>> 
>> Be typewritten or computer printed and shall include in respect of each
>> musical work
>> the name/s of the composer, publisher, form of rendition, record
>> manufacturer's
>> catalogue number and the duration,
>> 
>> The list for each day shall state the total duration of all works
>> communicated on that
>> day and the total duration of the communicated time of that day.
>> 
>> ---
>> 
>> Ideally I'd like the 'music playout' report to do the following:
>> 
>> - retain existing fields in the current report but..
>> - remove the 'cut' field
>> - add 'publisher' 'composer' 'user defined' fields to the line by line
>> output
>> - have the ability to optionally include 'client' 'agency' fields as well to
>> the line by line output
>> - have the report provide a total audio length 'a-len' broadcast for each
>> calendar day (or part of day generated by the report)
>> - have the report provide a total duration of the time period covered by the
>> report
>> 
>> I think the above tweaks would address my music reporting licensing needs.
>> 
>> Any help / info on how to achieve the above would be appreciated.
>> 
>> Best, Paul.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rivendell-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Rivendell-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev

_______________________________________________
Rivendell-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev

Reply via email to