Here's a snapshot after I issue a cd /var/snd and ls
040220_001.wav 040454_001.wav 040644_001.wav 040863_001.wav
060001_008.wav
040221_001.wav 040455_001.wav 040644_002.wav 040864_001.wav
060001_009.wav
040222_001.wav 040456_001.wav 040644_003.wav 040865_001.wav
060001_010.wav
040223_001.wav 040457_001.wav 040644_004.wav 040866_001.wav
060001_011.wav
040224_001.wav 040458_001.wav 040644_005.wav 040867_001.wav
040225_001.wav 040459_001.wav 040644_006.wav 040868_001.wav
040226_001.wav 040460_001.wav 040644_007.wav 040869_001.wav
[rd@sgospel snd]$
And also a df-h
[rd@sgospel snd]$ df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda3 25G 3.8G 22G 15% /
devtmpfs 3.8G 0 3.8G 0% /dev
tmpfs 3.8G 44K 3.8G 1% /dev/shm
tmpfs 3.8G 33M 3.8G 1% /run
tmpfs 3.8G 0 3.8G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/sda1 1014M 33M 982M 4% /boot/efi
/dev/sda2 100G 60G 41G 60% /home
/dev/sda4 1.7T 42G 1.6T 3% /sda4
tmpfs 770M 4.0K 770M 1% /run/user/1000
In /var is the symbolic link:
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 rivendell rivendell 9 Dec 16 2018 snd -> /sda4/snd
Is this right?
Rick
On 11/28/2019 7:53 AM, Cowboy wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 18:35:23 -0500
"R. Choy" <[email protected]> wrote:
There is no "mounted on" /var/snd only a symbolic link pointing to /sda4 in
the old
existing /var/snd
Important distinction...
symbolic link pointing to /sda4 in the old
or
symbolic link pointing to /sda4 **IS** the old
??
_______________________________________________
Rivendell-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://caspian.paravelsystems.com/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev
