Yes, there is a "mark brommer" in the ICLA file :) The entry is this :
notinavail:Mark Brommer:Mark Brommer:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:Signed CLA
I guess the ".org" was clear enough to get right. :)
Any chance you could try again?
Also, to get a good url to the archive, the way I've found is to go
to the message, then click on "Message View", which sould make it
easy to pick off the URL from the browser - for example :
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-river-dev/
200701.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 18, 2007, at 6:48 AM, Mark Brouwer wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Jan 18, 2007, at 3:40 AM, Mark Brouwer wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
On 1/16/07, Jim Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have fax'ed in what I think is the needed legal agreement
from Sun. Not sure what ACK I should expect (if any), or what
the next step is.
The CCLA has been recorded. The next logical step is a vote to
accept, but
that doesn't make much sense until the PPMC is set up and that
requires CLAs
all around. Are we all covered yet?
Dunno, see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-river-dev/
200701.mbox/browser,
so far it has not been corrected.
I don't understand what you think needs to be corrected... It
looks ok...
Sorry Geir, it seems that it ain't trivial to link to the archives. Is
there a way one can refer to the archives that makes sense?
I was referring to my statement that I've seen an unlisted CLA
referring to "Mark Brommer" that arrived shortly after faxing the
CLA at
http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html which I think is due
to my
handwriting. I asked if somebody could correct that, so far no
answer to
that question, hence this posting. As I've no clue about any legal
implications of me going forward as Mark Brommer the rest of my life I
thought of it as worth mentioning.
--
Mark
