The reason why I would have had you submit another one is simply for
clarity w/ minimum dependency on ephemeral institutional memory.
Suppose we have some sort of IP issue in the future - say a lawsuit -
and the ASF needs to show that it has ICLAs for all contributors.
I've won the lottery and purchased and retired to the Principality of
Sealand, and you've decided to corner the market on ice cube mines in
antarctica.
How do we defend the fact that we have no paperwork on file from you
w/o us individuals having to be involved to resolve the ambiguity?
geir
On Jan 18, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Mark Brouwer wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Jan 18, 2007, at 7:19 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Jan 18, 2007, at 7:04 AM, Mark Brouwer wrote:
You mean faxing the CLA? I think that would result in the same
result
with my handwriting and if I have to write it again I have to
post it
first to somebody with access to a fax. Isn't it possible you
mail them
that the interpretation of my handwriting went slightly wrong
and that
the correct data is:
Mark Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I were the ASF secretary, I'd make you do it again :)
However, I'll leave it up to him. I informed him of the changes
and we'll see what he says.
He made the fix - no need for another copy
Cool, I'm so glad you are not the ASF secretary, probably for multiple
reasons ;-)
--
Mark
